Advanced Silver Solution

For regular visitors, you may have noticed that I have changed thecn format of the Home Page of my main website, www.AdvancedSilverSolution.com. 

The reason for this are as follows:

1. Most of my pictures and graphics were unnecessarily large, therefore taking up a lot of space in the window.  This meant a lot of scrolling up and down to find the information.  By reducing the size of the graphics, more information is available in the window at any given time, making it easier to find what you want.
2. When most people open a website for the first time, if they can’t see what they want straight away they hit back button.  I realised that although I had a lot of good information on my Home Page (honest), there was actually very little of value in the first opening window.

I hope that these changes will make browsing easier for you and I would be happy to receive any feedback on what you think of the new look (including any errors) 

Thank you

I don’t really like the term “superbugs”, its a bit dramatic for the likes of me with my British stiff upper lip (oh well, better than a lower quivering lip)

However, superbug is the description given to antibiotic resistant bacteria found in pork in an article published on the website of the Organic Consumers Association. The article refers to a study by public health researchers of the University of Minnesota that found antibiotic resistant bacteria was found in about half of the pigs tested was also found in about 7% of swine veterinarians working with them. One smart observer commented that he would make sure that he would thoroughly cook any veterinarians before eating them.

I would suggest that you read the whole article here.

This is why I refer anybody worried about antibiotic resistant bacteria (like MRSA) to look at the advanced colloidal silver solution, as bacteria cannot mutate and become resistant due to the different pathogen kill mechanisms used.

On another note, pigs have been seen as unclean animals for centuries. Even in biblical times people were advised not to eat the meat of pigs. I hope I don’t offend anybody here, but I believe that the original dictate not to eat pork was nutritional advice for health reasons rather than (as it has become) for religious or spiritual reasons. Just my opinion, I’m not trying to belittle anybodies beliefs.

There is much debate and concern these days about the damage of the huge and rapidly growing Chinese economy to the global environment.  Already they may be producing more CO2 than the USA.  Although the future Beijing Olympics has become very political due to human rights violation in Tibet, one good spin-off is that the Chinese are keen to enhance their environmental credentials to the rest of the World.

I read a few years back that some Chinese cities have Environmental Committees, which have the power to shut down local factories for a few days if the local air get too contaminated.  As much as I am not a fan of communism, this would appear to be an advantage of the communist system.  Imagine in the West if we shut down factories in any given city until the air cleared.  Large companies would be suing the government over loss of production and because their competitors in other parts of the country where getting an unfair advantage.

The Chinese actually have a 5 year plan in place to reduce the reduce their carbon footprint by 20% through mix of renewable sources such as solar and wind power.  With such a huge population in a rapidly modernising country, how can we expect the Chinese people to go without the things that we take for granted.  However, with all the haggling in the West over international environmental treaties and some countries not wanting to commit themselves unless other countries commit, it seems that it is the East that will set the example.  Whatever other aspects of China’s policies we may not like, a goal to reduce carbon output in a rapidly growing economy is to be applauded.

Each year over 100,000 Americans die of MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus).  The real tragedy is that many of these were healthy people who had gone into a hospital for a minor operation and end up being infected with MRSA.

The New Advanced Colloidal Silver Solution made by American Biotech Labs (ABL) was tested against MRSA and was found to kill it effectively.  In trials the New Advanced Colloidal Silver (by ABL)  killed MRSA up to 10 times more effective than a product by a leading pharmaceutical company, even though the competing product contained 300 times as much active ingredient (silver). 

 
         
  MRSA with dividing membranes          MRSA 1.4 minutes after applying
  indicating they are about                   the new Advanced Colloidal Silver 
           to multiply                            Solution.  99% of MRSA are destroyed

Bacteria is unable to become resistant to silver as it can do with anti-biotics.  This is because silver uses a different kill mechanism which pathogenic bacteria can not mutate from.  In its new 2006 patent for Advanced Colloidal Silver Solution, ABL makes the following claims for killing MRSA:

       Kills Staphylococcus Aureus at 5.0 parts per million
       Kills Osteomyelitis Staphylococcus Aureus at 5.0 parts per million
       Kills Eye Infection Staphylococcus Aureus at 5.0 parts per million
       Kills Pneumonia Staphylococcus Aureus at 5.0 parts per million
       Kills Impetigo Staphylococcus Aureus at 1.25 parts per million
       Kills Skin Infection Staphylococcus Aureus at 5.0 parts per million

The fact that The US Patent Office issued a patent in 2006, means that the above claims have been independently verified.  Furthermore, the Advanced Colloidal Silver Solution is marketed at 14 parts per million, when it only takes 5 parts per million to kill MSRA.

The Advanced Silver Solution is marketed by Nutronix International.  If you buy 2 bottles you can get 1 free.

Many modern items of makeup contain carcinogens and other chemical nasties, which overtime add to a woman’s toxic load.  There are a number of ranges available that advertise themselves as safe and chemical free.  Unfortunately most of them still have some trace chemicals left in them.  For a healthy woman, these are probably quite adequate.

But for ladies following a strict detox program (like the Dr Clark anti cancer protocol), you may require something even purer.  In fact Dr Clark recommends no makeup at all.  That said, Mr Liam Young of The Natural Health Choice (who is an expert in the Clark Protocol) recommends the Miessence range which is not only 100% completely free of any synthetic chemicals, but it is organic too. 

My partner who is following (in part) the Clark anti-cancer protocol has had to give up many things and had been rather down about not being able to use makeup either.  She was therefore delighted when introduced to the Miessence range.  She has found that some of the products are not as strong in their colouring as conventional makeup, but she is just happy to be able so use something that is safe.

As mentioned in Part 1 and Part 2 of my postings on the Dr Clark Anti-Cancer Protocol, from personal experience it is very thorough and effective, but it is also very difficult to strictly follow without a team of dedicated carers.  Having other family commitments (a 13 year old daughter - going on 25) I really struggleto fulfil the requirements when caring for my partner (and we often miss parts out).  I also know of a father and son who both gave up work to care for their wife/mother full time using the Dr Clark Protocol and even with 2 of them they found it difficult to keep up with.

It is however still worth using as a baseline when following other therapies (including chemotherapy and radiation).

Supplements recommended by the Dr Clark Protocol need to be of the highest standard and purity.  We get ours from The Natural Health Choicehere in the UK.  I had included the website address on my original posting, but it was not live and running at that time.  It is now up and running and taking orders over the Internet.

The Natural Health Choiceis owned and operated by Mr Liam Young.  Over the last couple of years, we have found Liam to be very friendly, very efficient, and most importantly . . . . very knowledgeable on the Dr Clark Protocol (amongst other things).  He has been able to advise us and guide us along the way.  For anybody following the Clark Protocol, I would seriously recommend Liam and his company, not only for his products, but for his invaluable guidance too.

Further to the first part of this posting, a Dr Norbert Sass corresponded with me via the ”Comments”, and then directly.  Dr Sass is apparently a German doctor working on cancer and using similar methods to the Dr Coy diet. 

I have to say that I have no direct experience with this doctor, so I can not vouch for him personally.  That said, I have no reason to doubt him either. 

Dr Sass has provided me with a couple of articles which he agreed to let me reproduce on my blog.  I therefore would like to thank Dr Sass for sharing this information with me and my readers.  One article is from the British Journal of Cancer and the other one is in German.  Although I can’t read (or speak) German, I have included it anyway, in case any of my readers can.

Dr Sass has given me permission to print his contact details which are:
          By phone (Germany) 1 646 696 8449
          By email: somina-usa@hotmail.de

To read the articles, follow the links below:
              british-journal-of-cancer-article
             beispiele-article-in-german

Something that not everybody realises is that the HIV test does not actually test for HIV. 

So what does it test for Charlie?

It tests for the antibodies to HIV. 

So what?

Well if it was to test for actual HIV, then it could be said to be specific.  However, as it tests for antibodies to HIV, it is not specific.  If one antibody was to fight just one virus then that would be fine, but any given antibody can actually fight a whole range of viruses.  Logic dictates then that a whole range of viruses can give a false positive reading when tested.  Scientific literature has recorded over 60 medical condition that create raised antibody actively which can lead to a false positive.  That includes: flu, flu injection, malaria, tetanus injection, hepatitis A & B, recent viral infections and even pregnancy!

William Blattner who is an expert on HIV/AIDS said in 1989, ”one difficulty in assessing the specificity and sensitivity of retrovirus assays is the absence of a final gold standard.  In the absence of gold standards for HTLV-I and HIV-1, the true sensitivity and specificity for the detection of viral antibodies remain imprecise“.  Furthermore, between 1989 and 1998, an insert to the Abbott HIV antibody test stated, “At present there is no recognised standard for establishing the presence or absence of HIV-1 antibody in human blood“.

Now you may think that I am quoting old references here.  You’re right.  However, in the early/mid 80’s when diagnosis was known not be very specific, the first drug used was AZT, a side effect of which is myelosuppression.  That is damaging the ability of the bone marrow to produce new whites cells (the recipient would acquire an immune deficiency).  A key factor in determining whether a person with HIV was developing full blown AIDS is the white blood cell count which AZT would damage. 

Furthermore, the standards applied to HIV testing (particularly the Western Blot) vary depending on which part of the world you live in.  The criteria for being positive in Africa is lower than in most other parts of the world (there’s a surprise).  So if you are a HIV positive African, move to the West and you may become HIV negative

I have mentioned before that this is something I feel passionate about (Part 1, comments).  Otherwise I could have emphasised that trials are being conducted on the Advanced Colloidal Silver (which I promote) against HIV.  However, I have not emphasised what could have been a good sales gimmick for me as I don’t want to take advantage of peoples suffering and I genuinely believe that this information needs to reach the people who need it.

It is important to note here that poppers are a known immune system suppressant.  If you use them continually, you will acquire an immune deficiency however healthy you may be now.

Another very important point to note is that only about 40% of the homosexuals in the French study actually had traces of the retro-virus.

To sum up, 99 to 100% of the study group were abusing a known immune suppressant, whilst only about 40% had traces of a retro-virus that 20 years and $20billion found clinically insignificant.  Despite this and the fact that Dr Robert Galo was later found guilty of scientific fraud for taking credit for the French discovery, the US government declared war on HIV/AIDs and a huge gravy train was gathering momentum.   

Those of us around in the 80’s will recall that AIDS was primarily associated with gay people and drug addicts at the time.  As discussed, drugs will lower your immune system so that would account for drug addicts and the gay people who were using poppers acquiring an immune deficiency.  As much of mainstream society back then was intolerant of the fledgling gay rights movement, and drug users have never been popular; it made them easy targets to blame for what was perceived as a new oncoming epidemic.  I don’t remember the figures, but it was predicted back in the 80’s that AIDS would be killing off masses all over the globe by now.  Being able to blame unpopular groups in society helped the gravy train to build up even more speed as the rest of us would need to be saved from them.

Furthermore, AZT had (during the war on cancer) been rejected as it was excessively toxic (even by chemotherapy standards).  So if you were HIV positive at that time, you would be given a drug that would lead you to acquire an immune deficiency.   

The most basic requirements to staying alive are to eat, drink and breathe. Each of these activities requires substances (food, water, air) to enter our bodies through our mouths. Active imaginations can add a few more things to the list, but I’m not going there.

Much is spoken of these days about toxic load and extra resistant bacteria. Whilst these can enter our bodies through our skins, I think it is logical to deduce that most toxins and bacteria will enter our body through out mouths. Bearing in mind that our mouths are designed to absorb food and water, it is the most direct route to our bloodstream. That means that toxins and bacteria also have access to this quick route to the bloodstream. Keeping the mouths clean is therefore very important to our health (as well as our social lives).

But as more and more people are realising, many toothpastes and oral hygiene products contain chemicals that are bad for us and build up our toxic load. So there you have it, do you let the bacteria get you, or do you let the toxic load get you?

Well there is actually an answer that will allow you to effectively kill the bacteria without using any chemicals such as toothpastes (and is still good for your social life). That is the Soladey Ionic Toothbrush, which has been clinically proven to be more effective than other toothbrushes.

How does it work?

The Soladey ionic toothbrush handle contains a titanium dioxide rod which is photosensitive. This means that it reacts to light (sunlight, fluorescent light, or an ordinary bulb) to create negatively charged electrons (ions). These negative ions are transferred from the rod, via optic-fibre bristles into the saliva, where they attract the positive hydrogen ions from the acid in the plaque. This breaks down plaque in your mouth on a molecular level.

The handle with the titanium rod should last for life without needing replacement, only the heads need replacing.

Benefits for your health:

1. You do not need to increase your toxic load by putting any cleaning chemicals into your mouth.

2. Apart from chemicals, many toothpastes contain abrasives that slowly scour and score the enamel on your teeth, making them vulnerable to soaking up stains from your food and drink.

3. Plaque is effectively removed.
Note: Clinical studies from several universities indicate that bacteria from plaque are a major reason for blood and digestive disorders in North America.

4. It kills the bacteria that cause cavities.

5. Rejuvenates and strengthens gums.

6. As your own saliva becomes the primary cleaning agent, it easily reaches all parts of your mouth.

Benefits for the environmental:

1. Used toothpaste goes down the drain to be absorbed by the environment (so ultimately we get it a second time round). Imagine how much toothpaste is going do the drain throughout Europe, Northern America and Asia. With an ionic toothbrush there is no toothpaste.

2. There are no batteries or moving parts to replace.

3. If you are not using batteries, toothpaste or other dental products, then you are also saving on packaging (estimated ¹/₃ to ²/₃’s less packaging required).

4. Less water is required as there is no toothpaste to washout (just your own saliva). It is estimated that if everybody in North America used an ionic toothbrush, 1.9 trillion litres of water could be saved.

Not only is it good for your health and the environment, but as no toothpaste or batteries are required then over the long term it is also good for your wallet. Now that is unusual.

An estimated 16 million people in Europe and Japan use the Soladey ionic toothbrush. I have been using one (without toothpaste) for over a year now. My daughter no longer complains that I have bad breath (she’s honest if not tactful), none of my wider family have even noticed and the dentist is happy.

For further information, or to acquire an ionic toothbrush, go to the ShopNutronix website, click on “Products”, (near top centre) then scroll down to “Soladey Ionic Toothbrushes”.

Once you tried it, please share your experience in the comments below.