Comments on: The Truth About HIV / AIDS (Part 1)

By: randi

randi — Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:48:05 +0000

Why , hasn’t our gov.& Dr. R. Galo been sued for any of the wrongful aids deaths.After all Dr Galo was pardoned by President Clinton,and you have to commit a crime to get a pardon.I think many of us know the hiv was gov. made by Dr . Galo.
I am just surprised no one has filed a wrongful death suit.I think that is yet to come, and I believe it will come soon with many filed law suits.

By: charliedw

charliedw — Fri, 08 May 2009 05:04:09 +0000

Hi Brent

Thanks for your comments. I agree with your comments on Africa. In fact I read a long time ago that when they do the test, the criterion is different in Africa to the West. On the test there are so many “bars” that have to reacte with the blood for a person to be considered positive. In the US and Europe it is 3 bars, in Africa it is only 2, making it easier to diagnose Africans as positive. I don’t know if that is still the case, but it seem quite racist to me.

As for AZT, that was originally made as chemotherapy for cancer. It was shelved (back in the 60’s I believe) for being excessively toxic. I’m with you on this one, what is the point in giving somebody who supposedly has a immune destroying disease, something that will definitely destroy their immune system.

Heroin and poppers will also wear down your immune system too.

Thanks again Brent for your contribution.

By: brent

brent — Fri, 08 May 2009 01:29:59 +0000

Oh by the way i forgot to mention that these kids that i knew that died of aids ranged in ages 21-23. So if present medical theory on aids in right and that being HIV takes about 8-10 years before it turns into Aids. So those guys got infected when they were 13-15 years of age? No freaking way.
Oh by the way i do know for a fact that one of those young men was a heroin addict and the other was a dance in New York and was a big popper user,the other guy i really don’t know if he did such activities.

By: brent

brent — Fri, 08 May 2009 01:26:00 +0000

There is absolutely no way anyone could convince me otherwise that AZT was not solely responsible for the vast majority of Aids related deaths.
I knew of 3 young men that found out that they tested positive for HIV and started taking AZT and died horrible deaths within a few months to a year.
The medical community decided that Aids might kill you,and that AZT might kill you,but AZT might kill the Aids so wtf do they have lose,either way the patient was probably going to die according to the prevalent medical opinion at the time.

By: brent

brent — Fri, 08 May 2009 01:16:00 +0000

I believe that you people are forgetting one very important fact in regards to those massive Aids/HIV numbers in Africa,and that would be that just a very few of those people that supposedly died of Aids was actually tested for the disease.
In Africa if you die of cholera,diahrrea,TB they list your death as an AIDS related death. Very few people in Africa have ever been tested for the HIV anti-body simply because it would be much to expensive to test all those people.

By: charliedw

charliedw — Fri, 01 May 2009 20:38:27 +0000

Hi Micah
Very well said

By: Micah

Micah — Fri, 01 May 2009 13:26:12 +0000

Different versions for different continents? That doesn’t fly in the age of globalization when avian flu mixes with swine flu mixes with european flu.
HIV equals AIDS propaganda has been extremely effective. I remember being taught about this at ten years old in school. It’s completely bogus. In Rethinking AIDS, the authors finds numerous cases where the spouses of HIV positive/AIDS patients were not infected even though they kept having sex. AIDS doesn’t leave these risk groups.
1. Corticosteroid users;
2. Cocaine/heroin/synthetic variants of these users;
3. Transplant patients and others taking immune-suppressing drugs;
4. Immune-suppressing conditions, as were mentioned in the article, parasitic infections and chronic malnutrition.

The public health folks needed a cash cow, and boy did they make one.
Thanks for posting this, Charlie!

By: Arthur Gittleman

Arthur Gittleman — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 16:13:18 +0000

The reason that symptons in Africa are diffenent is because the HIV virus is different. There is more of wasting in Africa version than West. There are verious different subtypes of HIV. They are not all the same as some people assume. I should also mention an intereting fact that is ignored that when using HIV drug when resistance occurs the virus is weakened sometimes by 2/3. It is than easier to treat using herbs that may not be considered strong inhibits of HIV compared to HIV drugs. This kind of things is not normally tried but it leaves a question about how to treat HIV. I have treated FIV which is a weaker virsus using HIV drugs and had them fail followed by herbs and the herbs produced undetectable virus that the HIV drugs would not. Mutations of virus changes the sequence and this has effect on the virus. Not sure what happens when you change most of the sequence if you still have a virus?

By: charliedw

charliedw — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 16:34:55 +0000

Hi Banana
No, I am not suggesting that at all. Amole Nitrate abuse is also linked with Kaposi’s Sarcoma. That is a form of wasting cancer where you get liesions on your body (as portrayed by Tom Hanks in the film Philidephia). This complaint is not common in Africa, but in the 1980’s was almost the signature of AIDS in the West.
AIDS suffers in Africa tend to show the symptons of parasitic infection, malnutrition and startvation. Now there’s a surprise for Africa!
Why would a disease like AIDS have different symptons on different continents? That does not make scientific sense.

By: Banana

Banana — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:30:41 +0000

So are you trying to tell us Amole Nitrate abuse is common in Africa – hence the huge problem with HIV there?