Category Archives: Dr Hulda Clark

Dr Clark’s Newsletter And Colloidal Silver

In the March issue of the Dr Clark Zentrum Newsletter, there is a whole page enclosed on Colloidal Silver.  It states that:

“In vitro, colloidal silver has been shown to kill certain bacteria, fungus and viruses, and even tumor cells”.

As I sell colloidal silver, it would be great for me to be able claim that it kills tumor cells, but I must in all honesty say that I’ve never heard this claim before, or seen anything to back it up.  The brand of colloidal silver that I promote has been far more extensively tested than any other brand available, yet I’ve never heard any mention of this before.

I will say that when my partner had cancer and the tumors had burst through the skin, colloidal silver was effective at keeping it clean.  The tumors emitted a thick liquid with a foul smell (which we assumed was bacteria).  When silver was regularly applied, the liquid thinned out and did not smell nearly as strong.  Although from my own personal experience (rather than scientific studies) I would advocate the colloidal silver for keeping a tumor clean, I have not seen any evidence that it kills cancer cells.

That said, the Clark foundation does specialise in cancer research, so it is possible that they have been involved in research that I am not aware of.

Whilst on that subject, some of my long-term readers will remember that I reported on some of the cancer therapies we tried at that time.  Sadly Michele did not make it and passed away in 2008.  Some people may have been surprised that I did not say too much about it at the time or express very much emotion on my blog.  I would just like to explain, that my feelings were/are private and I did not wish to share them on the internet.  That is not criticise people who do share their feelings of loss on their own blogs when they lose somebody; it is just not my way and I hope that you will understand and respect that this is just my way of dealing with things.

New Research Confirms Dr. Clark’s Findings.

As part of her protocol, the late Dr Hulda Clark used small currents on human cells to support organ function and to disrupt pathogens, parasites and cancer cells.  This was never supported by mainstream medicine.

However, the March Newsletter from the Dr Clark Zentrum, claims that more modern research supports what Dr Clark was advocating decades ago.  The newsletter refers to a study which reports that “small electrical currents can inhibit cancer cells“.  This report states:

“The alternating electric fields of very low frequencies (less than 1 kHz) have shown to stimulate excitable tissues such as nerve, muscle and heart. Low frequency electric fields also claim to stimulate bone growth and accelerate fracture healing. At very high frequencies tissue heating becomes dominant, thus serving the basis for some commonly used medical treatments such as diathermy and radio frequency tumour ablation”.

The Newsletter continues that since the early nineties, Dr Clark pointed out that parasites can release growth factors that turn cells cancerous.  Completely dismissed by mainstream which does not even consider parasites, a new study now confirms that the human liver fluke does actually do just that.

In the new study Dr Loukas states,

“It has been known that certain proteins secreted by O. viverrini cause cell growth, however the identity of the protein was unknown. We also knew that the parasite secreted granulin but we did not know that it could affect the human cells around it.  This discovery leads the way to a better understanding of how this parasite causes such a devastating form of cancer”.

Although it is claimed to be the “first research”, Dr Clark was advocating this many years ago.

The Human Liver Fluke

Washing Your Hands Can Avoid A Worm In The Brain!

A key part of the Dr Clark protocol is to rid the body of parasites.  Parasites are not taken as seriously in the West as they are in the tropical regions.  However, we in the developed West are still more prone to parasites then we realise.  Basic hygiene like washing hands with soap is important, not only for the obvious like after going to the bathroom or attending to somebody who is sick.  Even when handling uncooked meat (especially pork) we should thoroughly wash our hands as meat can contain parasites which we can get on our hands and spread.

The video below shows a women who was thought to have developed a brain tumour, but it turned out to be a worm in the brain.  Although having a worm made it much easier to treat, it is nonetheless just as dangerous.  The worm could have eaten through any part of her brain and had already made her very ill.  As gross as this is, it is worth seeing and worth showing to your kids to make sure that they understand why hygiene is important. 

Subscribe To The Dr Clark Newsletter

One of the most popular keywords that brings people to this blog is, “Dr Clark”, as her amazing work on fighting cancer is becoming increasingly popular, especially as more and more people turn away from orthodox cancer medicine due to its toxic side effects.  It occurred to me that I still get a newsletter from the main Dr Clark website, which will be of interest to people looking for more information on the Dr Clark’s protocol.

So if you want to stay abreast of the latest developments from the Dr Clark researchers, then go to http://www.drclark.net.  In the top right hand corner you will see a box which states, “Get Dr. Clark’s latest researches, news and updates FREE!“.  Next to this is a box where you enter your email address and submit. 

These updates are a must for anybody who is seriously interested in following the Dr Clark Protocol.

High Levels Of Vitamin D Can Help You Survive Prostrate Cancer

In a recent newsletter by Dr Mercola, he reports on a study which demonstrates that vitamin D from sunlight can reduce the risk of prostrate cancer.  160 prostrate cancer sufferers were categorised as having either low, medium or high levels of vitamin D.  Over the course of the study, sadly 52 men died from their prostrate cancers.  The highest death rate was amongst those with the lowest levels of vitamin D.  Those with high levels of Vitamin D were found to be 7 times less likely to die.

Dr Mercola points out that in the USA, prostrate cancer is the second most common form of cancer amongst men and it is estimated that an enormous 1 in 6 American men will suffer with it during their life time.

Getting more sunlight (even in the UK where I live) is really a matter of lifestyle.  Simple lifestyle changes can make a big difference to your chances of surviving prostrate cancer, or even preventing it from developing in the first place.

Although this study is good news, it is not really new.  Both Dr Hulda Clark and Dr Budwig who pioneered much of the alternative/complementary approach to fighting cancer recommended as much sunlight as possible decades ago.  It seems that the mainstream is only just now catching up.  The Clark protocol is very detailed an difficult to follow.  However, it is easy and quite cheap to include elements of the Budwig Oil-Protein Diet into your daily diet. 

If you fear that you may be at risk of any type of cancer (or if you already have it), then get as much sunlight as you can and get yourself the Oil-Protein Diet Book.  Both are simple lifestyle changes that can really make a big difference and possibly save your life.

 

budwig-diet

budwig-flax-oil

Dr Clark’s Cancer Protocol: Part 3

As mentioned in Part 1 and Part 2 of my postings on the Dr Clark Anti-Cancer Protocol, from personal experience it is very thorough and effective, but it is also very difficult to strictly follow without a team of dedicated carers.  Having other family commitments (a 13 year old daughter – going on 25) I really struggleto fulfil the requirements when caring for my partner (and we often miss parts out).  I also know of a father and son who both gave up work to care for their wife/mother full time using the Dr Clark Protocol and even with 2 of them they found it difficult to keep up with.

It is however still worth using as a baseline when following other therapies (including chemotherapy and radiation).

Supplements recommended by the Dr Clark Protocol need to be of the highest standard and purity.  We get ours from The Natural Health Choicehere in the UK.  I had included the website address on my original posting, but it was not live and running at that time.  It is now up and running and taking orders over the Internet.

The Natural Health Choiceis owned and operated by Mr Liam Young.  Over the last couple of years, we have found Liam to be very friendly, very efficient, and most importantly . . . . very knowledgeable on the Dr Clark Protocol (amongst other things).  He has been able to advise us and guide us along the way.  For anybody following the Clark Protocol, I would seriously recommend Liam and his company, not only for his products, but for his invaluable guidance too.

Dr Clark’s Cancer Protocol: Part 2

The main reason that Dr Clark left the government cancer research after 25 years and formed her own research facility is because she could see that the research was mainly being geared to the benefit of the pharmaceutical companies.  She felt that people should have the choice of being able to treat themselves at home and not forced down the toxic route of chemotherapy.  If I can elaborate a bit further, the pharmaceutical companies cannot make a profit unless they have a product that they can patent.  Natural products and herbs usually cannot be patented as they are already in common use.

 

For example, centuries ago in the days of the sailing ships, the most feared disease amongst sailors was scurvy.  It was discovered by the British Navy that something as simple as putting limes in the water would prevent and cure scurvy (that is where the British nickname of Limeys comes from).  It is part of the reason why Britain had such a large empire, not only could British ships go anywhere in the world, but more importantly – the sailors would still be fit to fight when they got there. 

 

Who would have thought that the humble lime could lead to world domination!

 

The active ingredient in the lime which cured scurvy is of course, vitamin C.  Now let’s put that into a modern context; no pharmaceutical company could patent the lime today (or vitamin C for that matter).  That means that nobody would be prepared to foot the bill for the mega expensive testing required today in order to prove that limes/vitamin C was in fact a “medicine” for scurvy.  A pharmaceutical company would therefore have to extract the vitamin C from the lime and attach it to another molecule, so that they could have something to patent as a ”cure for scurvy”.  The molecule that the vitamin C is attached to would by necessity have to be man-made in order to meet the requirements of the patent and this man-made element often leads to side-effects (which often require further drugs to address). 

 

Coming back to Dr Clark, her protocol recommends many natural products and herbs, though they have to be organic and very pure in quality.  One of them for example is the common spice, turmeric.  I recently saw a report on how a pharmaceutical trial was having success against cancer with turmeric and they were hopeful of being able to make a drug out of it. 

 

Why make a drug out of it? 

 

Why not just use the pure turmeric like Dr Clark?

 

The answer is course that pure turmeric cannot be patented for huge profits.

 

After Dr Clark went solo, she set up a research facility in the US.  Unfortunately she was hounded out by the financial interests of the pharmaceutical companies and the medical establishment.  She therefore re-located to Mexico.  She now primarily works with cancer patients who are considered terminal by conventional medicine.  She has had so much success with these so called “terminal” patients that she can no longer be ignored and the medical establishment has been grudgingly forced to accept her.

 

Much of today’s so called cutting edge cancer research is implementing what Dr Clark was doing years ago.  The Clark protocol as mentioned in my previous posting on the subject is very intense and consuming.  The requirement for very pure high quality natural products also makes it very expensive.  However, if you have cancer and you have the resources (full time carers, money) it is a worthwhile protocol to pursue.  If you don’t have these resources, then it is still worth looking at and implementing whatever sections that you can do in order to support your primary treatment.

Dr Clark’s Cancer Protocol

Doctor Clark’s protocol is usually considered as an “alternative therapy”.  However, Dr Clark was a government cancer researcher for 25 years.  After becoming disillusioned that cancer research was being geared to the benefit of the pharmaceutical companies, she started her own research facility where she has worked for another 25 years.  Her protocol is therefore based on hard science and is not an esoteric life/universal energy based therapy.  Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against these therapies (I have practiced Reiki myself); I just want to make it clear that it is based on scientific study as that gives it more credibility for some people.

 

A local woman that I know personally used this system to cure herself from breast cancer after she had been told that there was nothing more that the conventional medical system could do for her (the British National Health Service).  Basically; she had been sent home to die.  I have since heard a number of similar stories.

 

So what is Clark’s Protocol?  It is very extensive and covers a number of different areas.  Below is a brief summary of the main components.

 

Living Environment:  To reduce the toxic load in the body and allow the immune system to get on with its job, as many chemicals as possible must be removed from the proximity of the patient as even very small chemical particles can slow down the healing. 

Carpets and rugs should be removed as they hold dust and mites and should be replaced with something like laminate flooring. 

Wallpaper leaches formaldehyde, so should either be painted over with special environmentally friendly paint or replaced with a plastered wall.

All household cleaning should be done with natural products, not supermarket chemical products.

Household cleanliness must be kept very high.

 

Water:  Must be pure and filtered.  Even bottled water can contain too many impurities for somebody with cancer.  High street water filters do not remove enough impurities either.  Although the chlorine that is authorised for use in our water supply is relatively benign to the human body, there is a myth in the water industry that it is the same as laundry bleach.  As laundry bleach is cheaper and can be easier to apply, it is sometimes used in place of chlorine.  However, it is toxic, it feeds cancer and ordinary water filters will not remove it. 

You should consider a whole house water filter and not just a filter for drinking water, as water can be absorbed through the skin when you shower/bath.  It can also be absorbed by the clothes you wear next to your skin and dry on your dishes and cutlery when you wash them.

 

Personal Care:  This is especially difficult for the ladies.  No ordinary make up, no hair dye, no hair spray, no perfume and no scented soap or shampoo.  Again this is to reduce toxic load in the body which feeds the tumour and distracts an already impaired immune system.  There are a few approved brands of make up which are clean of harmful chemicals, notably Miessence (I am not a distributor).

 

Diet:  Should be totally organic.  Clark has noted that many tumours are linked with specific bacteria and parasites.  She has studied which foods feed which bacteria/parasites and a personalised diet needs to be made out.  Even fruit and vegetables that would normally be considered as healthy eating may need to be excluded if they also feed these specific bacteria/parasites.

 

Supplements:  Must be very pure and organic.  There is a very wide range of supplements, which needs to tailored to the specific needs of the patient.  The supplements recommended will take account of factors such as what type of cancer the patient has, what bacteria/parasites are present and what stage of the process the patient is at. 

A tumour is like a haven for bacteria, viruses and parasites; which are released into the body as the tumour starts to break down.  Furthermore, as the tumour dies it is like having a lump of rotting meat inside the body.  As it breaks down, dead pieces of tumour go floating around the body and need to be extracted.  Therefore the organs dealing with detoxifying the body (notably kidneys and liver) need extra support during this period to prevent death by organ failure.

 

Teeth:  All metal must be removed.  Research has proven that heavy metals in the mouth are linked to cancer. 

Also, where a tooth has had a route canal filling, the base of the tooth is usually infected, which in turn infects the jawbone where it is attached.  The Clark protocol dictates that any teeth with route canal fillings should be extracted, the gum peeled back and the jawbone itself surgically cleaned up.

 

Zapping:  This works a little bit like a TENS machine, sending a specific electrical frequency around to body to support organ function, or to kill bacteria and parasites.

 

The description above is by no means exhaustive and there is more to the Clark Protocol.  Having been extensively involved with it as a carer, I must admit that the Clark Protocol is very difficult to keep up with all the many facets of it.  However, I would recommend to anybody with cancer, have a look at it and read Dr Clarks book.  It is a good base line to support any other therapy, be it conventional or alternative.  Should you wanted to follow it on its own then you need a lot of support.  The local lady I know who cured herself with this protocol had her husband and about 3 late teen/early 20’s daughters to support her.  I have had to do it on my own with a daughter to raise too and it has been extremely difficult.  I had to give up the day job to become a full time carer. 

 

If you have a team of family/friends and can follow the Clark Protocol in detail, then it can be very effective on its own.

 

However, if you don’t have a least one person who can dedicate themselves as a full time carer (with no other family commitments), then I do not recommend you try this protocol in isolation, as it is so work intensive.  It is best with a “team” of carers.  I would recommend however that you apply all that you are reasonably are able to do, as it will support your other cancer therapy. 

 

Furthermore, you need an expert advisor and testing as you will need to have a tailored program, otherwise you can waste a lot of time and money. 

 

Books by Dr Clark:

                             

 

For further info:

Dr Clark’s own informational website is:   www.DrClark.net 

Recommended Therapists:  www.drclark.net/en/therapists/index.php

Dr Clark recommended products:  www.DrClark.com

Dr Clark dietary supplements:   www.the-natural-choice.co.uk

 

 

  • Recent Posts

  • Categories

  • Pages

  • Blog Stats

    • 39,429 hits
  • Category Cloud

    Budwig Oil-Protein Diet Cancer Chemical Sensitivity Colloidal Silver Solution Dr Coy's TKTL1 Anti Cancer Diet Dr Hulda Clark Evironmental Health HIV / AIDS malaria Miscellaneous MRSA Self Development sexually transmitted diseases Swine Flu/Bird Flu urinary tract infection